As for the actual match, the atrocious decision-making
by Cameroon on going forward, especially the attacking third, was a glaring
disappointment. The Africans played a 1-5-3-1-1 while Mexico were on a fluid
1-3-5-2. The Mexico midfield brushed aside the Cameroonians, who were
outnumbered and generally very weak in midfield, with some relative ease.
There was the obvious lack communication, the bad
decision-making, poor concentration, exposure at the wings and overall bad
defensive behaviour by Cameroon. They played too flat and very square, surviving
many scares by the swift-moving Mexico forwards who were passing precisely and
moving fluently to good attacking positions. With a few ounces of luck,
patience and clinical finishing, they could have wrapped the match earlier in
the first half. Their transition was swifter and relevant to keep Cameroon at
bay.
The goal came from the right midfield after, again,
a series of errors. Quick inter-passing founded on the acres of spaces and lack
of pressure on the ball and poor marking were complimented the long distances of
support and wrong angles of support at the defence of Cameroon. There was not
much compactness in the midfield either. The slow defending and central
defenders playing miles apart, allowing a free shot, lack of follow-up on the
rebound made the poor midfield job look innocent.
The goalkeeper could have punched the ball wide,
even though, it must be understood that the parry was a reflex action in
itself. He did enough to get down and have his powerful hand behind the ball. His
efforts to get up and try to deal with the second ball was a sign of great
agility and concentration.
No comments:
Post a Comment