In
South Africa, any youth clubs and structures are referred to as development
sides, while the northern neighbours call it juniors. Around the world, it is
plain youth development. Whatever the case, many develop these structures under
the main clubs as feeder operations to the senior teams that play in different
levels of the local leagues.
Before
the tenure of Dube, Themba Ndlela sourced the expertise of youth development
program from overseas. The First Sports Mobile Academy of Canada partnered with
Highlanders junior development in a venture that was named the Highlanders
Academy. It turned out it was not registered as such, but the project was in
progress.
For
political mileage, this has been used to throw eggs at the face of others
instead of working for the good of the club. For starters, many sought the
definition of the ‘academy’. Others shot the idea down as a fraud. In many
ways, the arguments for and against the academy bordered around misinformation
and ignorance.
The
unrealistic expectations were that the institution to be labeled an academy, a
few things needed to be in place. Zimbabwe has their standards which are guided
by Fifa. Fifa leaves much leeway for the national association to register and
monitor these. All the details rest with, in their case, Zimbabwe Football
Association.
Without
questioning the integrity of that association, as an example, their rules may
be massaged to favour a certain structure or institution. In 2012, I tried to
shed light of what an academy is, according to Fifa.
Fifa
expects an academy to recruit junior players, house them in dormitories, feed
and school them. It means that there should be enough buildings, training
grounds and qualified teachers. In the event that the minors come from very far
or another political territory, the academy must transport and house the
parents as well.
Without
losing track of the Chairman’s statement that there is no Highlanders Academy
but Highlanders Juniors, it all depends on the context and the actual reason
why he had to bring that up.
Junior
development is a general youth and talent nurturing. Many want to ponder on the
differences between the two. An academy is a professional way of developing
talent as compared to anyone or institution trying to do the same. The
equipment and manpower is one aspect that separates the two.
Given
the professionalism involved, the academy then assumes a certain shape and
direction in terms of planning and approach. A thorough analysis of the views,
objectives and vision get outlines as a philosophy.
The
culture of the institution is meant to has to be maintained from the under 8
age-group going up. The common problem is that the senior teams usually get
experienced coaches who have philosophies that differ from the academy, but
life goes on in that case. The academies and clubs do not change their culture
and philosophy to suit the coaches as they are usually passers-by.
Training
methods match the traditions of the club with the common aim to be best.
Achieving that is variable. As an example, some traditions and philosophies may
include the fact that the ball must be moved around with pace and on the
ground. The other may be that the ball must move from one end of the pitch to
the other with minimum time and touch – the long ball.
I
think many of these things are available at Highlanders but the Chairman and a
few people want to call them something else. When it comes to infrastructure
and registration with Zifa, it becomes another issue.
Actually,
the registration is just $1500.00. An issue alluded to the Chairman is that the
set-up was not in the interest of the club. That is despite rumours that the
paperwork is spot-on and players are contracted. Just in case that is not true,
that paperwork will need the same legal team that worked with them. The
Highlanders lawyers remain the same over the tenure of all chairmen.
Zifa
will or may make other demands that Bosso may fail to meet to be registered as
an academy. One thing for sure, all the issues highlighted in terms of Fifa are
but decoratory. For starters, it is only Real Madrid, Ajax and maybe Barcelona
meeting the criteria of Fifa. Manchester City are the only club in England in
the process of building an institution that will accommodate 120 players. There
is no one else.
Just
as an example of how other academies work, let us look at Aston Villa, and this
is typical. Players come from the local vicinity. The attend school and then go
to play football in the afternoon. Depending, many attend school three times a
week and the other days, they play football and Aston Villa arranges tutors for
the missed classes.
This
means that Villa has to liaise with schools and give the students the material
they must be studying. It can be twice and once a week. There may be times that
the players miss other lessons, in which case Villa makes arrangements. Again,
if Villa find a new recruit further away for convenient commuting, they must
find a accommodation for the player and his parents close by, as well as the
school. The academy pays for their upkeep and fees.
The
English regulation requires a certain distance from the academy to the point of
residence of the player. In cases where it is not so convenient to transport
and house the player, say from around Manchester, Villa can try to see if there
is a similar situation that clubs in that country have. If the players match each
other’s capability in a way that a compromise can be reached, they swap the
players in some sort of deal.
As
one can see, the deal can involve just training without transfer, but the
problem here is that the philosophies may not match. Usually it would be a
permanent arrangement, maybe for some time with some clauses.
One
of the most important things to note here is the age of the players in question.
At 8 to 12, many things can be overlooked because the players are too young.
Many teams do not commit much in such cases because at or after puberty, the
player personality change and the players may even decide they do not want to
pursue football as a career. Much care is taken in investing in these players.
The
Highlanders set-up has the capacity to do most of that, if registered through
Zifa and there are no vultures to seek political mileage in shooting down an
idea because it was seeded by the Ndlela administration. That cheap politicking
seems to be rearing its ugly head far too often and it may cost individuals
some elections.
Care
must be taken to understand that many clubs already to take care and manage the
players’ football, academic and social activities. The stakeholders have to be
parents and school and again, something Bosso has done before and can still do.
This was regardless whether the structure was labeled an academy or not.
The
sudden excitement to refute that label and the haste to dissociate with the
possibility of such is interesting. The ignorant trying to enlighten the blind
catalyse the decay process threatening to divide the club into fanatical factionalism,
a farce synonymous with Dynamos of Harare.
Whatever
induced the subject, one would like to believe the prudence and integrity of
the chairman is not dragged into the mud. He may have a great plan and vision,
but trying to fight the definition of the development program is a minor part
of his mandate. With or without his explanation, the value of his role and function
is not dented. He has the support of many people for a sterling job done last
season.
Many
had wanted to believe that his administration did not savour inheriting the
coach signed by his predecessors, and that he also wants to shed the ‘academy
tag’ away. Mr. Dube is not so small.
He
may not need to know that the youth development as an academy means a thorough
approach in nurturing the juniors and a professional attitude in dealing with
the parents, Zifa and the players, but that is what Bosso has always been done.
As chairman, he can always choose the name that sounds sweet to his ears, or to
the rest of those who raise the issue at the fall of the hat.
Whether
there is a plan in place to make things better or not, it is not clear. Any
further plan that the club can have on junior development easily qualifies as
an academy as long there is funds to meet the criterion set by the national
association. The rest of the issues are just academic and the executive
committee may waste their time and energy trying to rename the project as, say
Centre of Excellence, in which case, the electorate does not have to waste time
and energy voting for a crew that will lose time and focus disputing that
naming and its definitions.
If
the arguments are to meet the Fifa standards, something Manchester United,
Arsenal or Chelsea cannot match, then it is an issue that will hinge on the
expenses until maybe Aspire of Qatar can take over the club. Potential sponsors
will have issues with the kindergarten bickering that wastes wind. It could be
that the current regime does not want to work with FSMA because, again, they
had a relationship with the previous leadership. No one would like to think
that the leaders can be that childish. I believe the club will be looking for
funds to do everything in their power to register an institution that is in the
interest of the club and not themselves as individuals.
That
Highlanders Football Club Annual General Meeting came and went without much
fuss, with the acknowledgement of the supporters association as well as mapping
the way forward for the club. This will be followed by the Vice-Chairman and
Treasurer elections are on next week at the Club House. A lot of people handed
their nomination papers for both posts.
No comments:
Post a Comment