With Jarcqi Shipanga, Brave Gladiators coach and CAF Instructor |
My personal observation, having attended the best in South America and in Europe, is that all the course material is the same. What the system does is to equip coaches with uniform qualification based on the elementary, intermediate and advanced coaching material, most of which matches UEFA and FIFA modules very closely at each level.
What happened before, as I went through all the
different level materials meant for the CAF licenses, is that what I taught as
Level 1 and 2 was regarded as Level 3 or 4 (Advanced) in some countries and
even in the current set-up. Regardless of where one acquires their badges in
Africa, there will be a certain degree of understanding of their knowledge,
aptitude and understanding, provided they started with the current system.
In attending the courses from the low level, the
challenge is the interaction and even the examinations. Does one participate to
the best of their knowledge and ability, or stoop low as a novice? Both
scenarios have a danger. One does not want to be correctly answering each and
every question and arguing the basics that are not necessarily correct at a
higher level. That can extremely annoy the instructor big time.
To also take a back seat and let others digest the
course material and assimilate all the data can be boring as well as raise
question marks about your credibility, because the course directors and instructors
have your CV, which they suspect you doctored anyway.
That is not helped by the examination time as the
candidates begin to wonder on the requirements at that level. How much details
suffices or is inadequate, is a source of another headache when writing the
examinations or doing the practicals. The battle is fighting the urge to
provide TMI (Too Much Information) yet providing relevant information and
coaching.
One common aspect at different stages of learning is
in mathematics. One divided by four in lower grades, the answer is; it can’t.
At a higher level, things change. This is the dilemma of working at lower
levels.
National associations have been asked to run
‘equivalent course’ for those coaches with foreign certificates or extensive
prior experience as coaches or players. This noble idea had holes in it.
Equivalent course students write examinations, in most cases, it is oral.
Missing some bits of class makes a mammoth difference. The answers to their
questions include the material from the level of the course of their
‘equivalent’.
Otherwise, it is great to see the continent trying
to bring at par all colleagues, and that parity is aimed at bridging the gap
with Europe’s best. CAF Pro is being drafted and should be in line with the
UEFA Pro. CAF and UEFA are working on the syllabus and the instructors for
these courses.
This is Africa and those responsible for running the
courses are less likely to freely help people they think will take their
positions. (Who cares about positions?). If you are somewhere out of the
ordinary, you will have to hassle big time, but good luck. See you in the next
class.
No comments:
Post a Comment